· LESSON SUMMARY
Today’s lesson focuses on how to determine cause and effect when they are only implied, rather than explicitly stated.
This lesson focuses on two specific types of implication: reading between the lines to determine cause and reading between the lines to predict effects. In case you need a reminder: A cause is the person or thing that makes something happen or produces an effect. An effect is the change that occurs as a result of some action or cause. Cause tells us why something happened; effect tells us what happened after a cause (or series of causes).
· Determining Implied Causes
In order to see how to determine causes that are implied rather than stated, look at the following brief fictional passage. Read the passage carefully and actively. After you make your observations, see if you can use the writer’s clues to determine why the characters are fighting.
“Anne sat with her feet up on the couch, drinking a Coke. She heard footsteps by the front door. Brenda was right on time, as usual. Never a minute early or late—for her, everything was very exact. Anne placed her feet on the floor, reached for the remote, and turned off the television. She knew Brenda would demand her complete attention. She knew Brenda would hang up her coat in the closet by the door (third hanger from the left) and then head to the kitchen for her daily inspection (exactly seven steps).
She knew this because they had been roommates for six months. Taking a deep breath, she
thought about what she would say to Brenda. She waited and watched from her spot on the couch. A moment later, Brenda stepped into the kitchen and surveyed the scene. Anne watched her expression, watched her eyes focus on the sink, and watched her face harden when she saw the dishes piled high. Pointing to the dishes, Brenda said disappointedly, “I don’t believe what I’m seeing. I thought we agreed to share the responsibilities. I thought it was your turn to clean the kitchen this week?” “I haven’t gotten to them yet,”Anne replied. “I’ve been really busy. Relax. I’ve got all night.” She walked into the kitchen and added her empty glass to the top of the pile.
Brenda fumed. “You know I’m having company tonight! Somehow I thought you would have
done your share in the kitchen. If we want to remain roommates, things have to change. ” The phone rang, and Anne darted to answer it. Brenda said in the background, “Tell them to call back, we need to settle this now. I told you I’m having company soon.” Anne ignored Brenda’s comment and continued to engage in conversation with a good friend of hers. “Did I ever tell you about the time when . . “
Look carefully at the dialogue between these two characters.What do they say to each other? How is it said? What other clues from the author can you find in this passage to help you understand the cause of their conflict? List your observations below and then answer the questions
Example: I noticed that Anne was relaxing and watching TV when Brenda arrived.
1. Why does Brenda get angry?
a. because Anne is unfriendly
b. because she had a bad day at work
c. because Anne didn’t do the dishes
d. because Anne is lazy
2. Why didn’t Anne do the dishes?
a. She didn’t have time to do them.
b. She wanted to start a fight.
c. She was too lazy.
d. She wants Brenda to get a new roommate.
3. What does Anne do that shows she doesn’t intend to shoulder her share of the responsibilities?
a. She turns off the television.
b. She begins to wash the dishes in the sink.
c. She always helps around the house.
d. She talks on the phone with a good friend.
· Determining Implied Effects
In order to learn how to determine implied effects, take another look at Mr. Miller (the man who had a radio stolen from his car) and the parking garage where he parks. Reread the statement of the parking garage manager as well as the one from Mr.Miller’s neighbor and then use these statements to predict how the robbery will affect Mr.Miller and the parking garage.
a. Parking garage manager
Radios have been stolen from four cars in our parking garage this month. Each time, the thieves have managed to get by the parking garage security with radios in hand, even though they do not have a parking garage identification card, which people must show as they enter and exit the garage. Yet each time, the security officers say they have seen nothing unusual.
b. Mr.Miller’s neighbor
Well,Mr.Miller’s a pretty carefree person. I’ve borrowed his car on several occasions, and a few times, I’ve found the doors unlocked when I arrived at the garage. He often forgets things, too, like exactly where he parked the car on a particular day or where he put his keys. One time, I found him wandering around the garage looking for his keys, which he thought he dropped on the way to the car, and it turned out the car door was unlocked anyway. Sometimes, I wonder how he remembers his address, let alone to take care of his car. Based on these two paragraphs, which of the following effects would be logical results (effects) of the thefts? Circle the correct answers.
1. Security will be tighter in the parking garage from now on.
2. People walking in and out of the garage will be required to show their identification cards with no exceptions.
3. The security officers will be fired.
4. Mr.Miller will get his radio back.
5. Mr.Miller will be more careful about locking hiscar door.
6. Mr.Miller will get a new car.
7. Some people who currently park in the garage will find a new garage to park their car.
8. Mr.Miller will be more careful with his keys.
Effects 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 are logical predicted outcomes. Effect 3 is not likely because it is too extreme; the parking garage manager’s statement does not suggest that he plans to fire security guards. Rather, it suggests that he plans to look into the security problem. There is nothing in either statement to suggest that effect 4 (that Mr.Miller will get his radio back) is correct.
Finally, there is no reason at all to think that Mr. Miller will get a new car because his radio was stolen. He’ll likely get a new radio and perhaps he’ll look for a new parking garage, but there’s no evidence from the two statements to suggest that a new car is a likely possibility.
· SummaryIn reading, particularly in reading literature, as well as in real life, you often have to figure out what the causes of a particular event or situation might have been. The same is true of effects: Both in reading and in life, you spend a lot of time trying to predict the outcomes of real or predicted actions or events. If you “read between the lines”without going too far beyond what the passage (or real-life event) actually contains, you can usually do a pretty good job of predicting these causes and effects.
NB: Tugas Reading Comprehension